upper extremity functional index spanish version

The upper extremity functional index evaluates the impairment the subject perceives they encounter when performing 20 types of activities of daily living. There are several regional upper limb PROs that are advocated and recommended by national associations or organizations around the world for Physical, Occupational and Hand Therapy, Orthopedics and Surgery. A total of 216 voluntary BCS from Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga participated in the study. A two stage observational study was conducted. Liebenson, C. (2007). 0000075574 00000 n Jreskog KG, Srbom D: LISREL 8.80. Martnez-Cal J, Molina-Torres G, Carrasco-Vega E, Barni L, Ventura-Miranda MI, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Healthcare (Basel). This study aimed to assess. PMC 2013 Nov;93(11):1507-19. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130041. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. 2014), and has been validated for use in Spanish (Barbosa et al. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. ^o_on/* G jTIr.1Urc~cz"SJ v8;' g /TF!o-+zlTuRYf.~?E=. Methods A two stage observational study was conducted. It was noted that four factors had Eigenvalues >1.0 and accounted for 85.8% of variance; however those with an Eigenvalue >1.0 each accounted for <10% of variance and were shown to be after the screeplot initial inflection point (Figure2) and consequently not extracted. 0000075417 00000 n La validit longitudinale a t dtermine en fonction du lien (r de Pearson) entre les scores de changement de la fonction et de la douleur (moment 1moment 3). Bravini, E.; Franchignoni, F.; Giordano, A.; Sartorio, F.; Ferriero, G.; Vercelli, S.; Foti, C. Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in Subjects with Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. 0000157317 00000 n Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004,47(6):389395. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the broader versions of ULFI across different languages, this studys results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer. 4 0 obj Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, Neller A: The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. The authors declare they have no competing interests. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2010, 23: 105110. Please let us know what you think of our products and services. Introduction The Upper Limb Functional Index . No special Pajares B, Roldn-Jimnez C, Alba E, Cuesta-Vargas AI. 2023 Feb 24;14:989403. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.989403. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures [1, 2] are primarily used to objectively reflect a patients health or functional status at any given time and to detect changes in this status as a response to an intervention [3]. Longitudinal validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between function and pain change scores (Time 1-Time 3). Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Unfallchirurg 2003,106(13):19. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 0000155336 00000 n The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. This is through their respective institutional websites and subject related Journals. Qual Life Res 2009,18(8):10431051. Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas and Phillip C Gabel participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. Finally, the inclusion of Hispanic/Latino/ South American participants in future studies could potentially provide confirming or conflicting linguistic information due to the cultural and ethnic difference with respect to the Spanish participants. Accessibility 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G: Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Bookshelf doi: 10.7759/cureus.33381. The KolmogorovSmirnov test by one sample (significance > 0.05) was used to calculate the samples distribution and normality. PubMed In a study by Stratford et al[1], comparing Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI 20- item) and the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), the discriminant cross-sectional validity of the UEFI was found to be 6.65 with p = .003 while the convergent cross-sectional validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.82. The study limitations include the lack of longitudinal data regarding other psychometric properties including responsiveness or sensitivity to change and error scores as a representation of a minimal clinically important difference. 0000158137 00000 n Hidding, J.T. https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Upper_Extremity_Functional_Index&oldid=259397, Any of your usual work, housework, or school activities, Your usual hobbies, recreational or sporting activities, Lifting a bag of groceries to waist level, Lifting a bag of groceries above your head, Pushing up on your hands (eg, from bathtub or chair), Laundering clothes (eg, washing, ironing, folding), Carrying a small suitcase with your affected limb. The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011,11(63):174188. interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. ; Morales-Asencio, J.M. Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. In most cases Physiopedia articles are a secondary source and so should not be used as references. The four published studies to date investigating the ULFI suggest the practical characteristics along with the responsiveness and error range [4, 8] 0000095818 00000 n 0000083070 00000 n The UEFI is addressed to patients diagnosed with orthopaedic conditions that affect the upper limb (shoulder, elbow, wrist or hand). Patients respond to each item by circling a number that best describes their level of difficulty. Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) Demonstrates a Valid Outcome Measure for the Lower Limb Region and Joints. McPhail SM, Bagraith KS, Schippers M, Wells PJ, Hatton A: Use of Condition Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Criterion validity was determined through the concurrent use of the EQ-5D-3L total score and EQ-5D-3L-VAS scores with the ULFI-Sp measures. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. Bartlett, M.G. There are currently two versions of the upper extremity functional index; UEFI 20-item and UEFI 15-item. 0000070344 00000 n (Additional file 1). Consequently, the ULFI-Sp may be useful in Spanish-speaking populations and for making cross-ethnic and cross-cultural comparisons in other English speaking countries with a high Spanish-speaking population. ; Jnsson, C.; Olsson, A.C.; Gard, G.; Johansson, K. Womens Experience of Physical Activity Following Breast Cancer Treatment. Contract N PS16060 partially funded this research project in IBIMA between NovartisIBIMA (translation research in cancer B-01 and Clinimetric F-14). . Article sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal ; Abrams, G.; Mastick, J.; et al. Le coefficient de corrlation intracatgorie (CCI) et le changement dtectable minimal (CDM) ont quantifi la fiabilit de testretest (moment 1moment 2). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 0000000016 00000 n 2018 Dec;18(6):e1261-e1267. Stock SR, Streiner D: The impact of neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders on the lives of affected workers: development of a new functional status index. Development and initial validation of the upper extremity functional index. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Martn-Martn J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, Ribelles N, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldn-Jimnez C. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. ; Amadio, P.C. The DASH is a 30-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs. Bada X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A: The Spanish version of EuroQoL: A description and its applications. The correlation between the ULFI total score and the regression score obtained from the one-factor solution MLE was also high ( = 0.996). 0000084264 00000 n We satisfied the recommended minimum ratio of five participants-per-item [24]. Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. Before Bejer A, Bie A, Kyc S, Lorenc M, Mataczyski P, Domka-Jopek E, Melloh M, Gabel CP. Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires. %PDF-1.3 0 0000156965 00000 n Cross-cultural adaptation of the upper limb functional index in Arabic. Health Qual Life Outcomes. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PubMed 0000153258 00000 n Int J Environ Res Public Health. The correlation between items and the regression score from MLE, communalities, and the average score for each item is shown in, Therefore, a new 14-item model (short version) was tested with those items with communalities higher than 0.3. Martn-Martn J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, Ribelles N, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldn-Jimnez C. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. These tools also guide treatment decisions and assess the effectiveness of interventions, including direct comparisons between pre- and post-operative status, and subsequently during rehabilitation [13]. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA: Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Int Orthop 2008,32(4):497504. Man Ther 2011,16(2):177182. The results for the psychometric properties support the findings of the previous research on the original English version of the ULFI indicating broad cross-cultural adaptions would be appropriate to other diverse cultural and linguistic groups. 0000072036 00000 n ; Michener, L.A.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. ; Alfano, C.M. 0000081478 00000 n Muiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK: International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition. Zero represents no pain/disability, and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable/severe disability for each item. Alderman AK, Chung KC: Measuring Outcomes in Hand Surgery. The UEFI-15 was calculated from relevant items in the UEFI-20. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. Correspondence to 10.1157/13093053. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. 0000156641 00000 n Available online: LeBlanc, M.; Stineman, M.; DeMichele, A.; Stricker, C.; Mao, J.J. Validation of QuickDASH Outcome Measure in Breast Cancer Survivors for Upper Extremity Disability. Distribution and normality were determined by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (significance >0.05). ; Seo, K.S. government site. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) [32] which is criticized due to it development methodology using a specific workers population in a small data set with a high average age [6, 8]. 0000084740 00000 n Objectif : tudier la fiabilit, la validit et la sensibilit au changement des versions 20 questions et 15 questions raffines par Rasch de l'Indice fonctionnel des membres suprieurs (IFMS-20 et IFMS-15, respectivement) et dterminer l'effet du bras dominant sur la diffrence minimale positive cliniquement importante (pDMCI). 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9894 (Full text article) Spanish: The .gov means its official. 0000078184 00000 n Legal and Forensic Medicine Area, Department of Human Anatomy, Legal Medicine and History of Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29010 Mlaga, Spain, Grupo Clinimetra en Fisioterapia (F-14), Instituto de Investigacin Biomdica de Mlaga (IBIMA), 29590 Mlaga, Spain, UGCI Oncologa Mdica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Mlaga, Spain, Instituto de Investigacin Biomdica de Mlaga (IBIMA), 29590 Mlaga, Spain, Department Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain, School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia. Results: The factor structure was one-dimensional. Psicothema 2013, 25: 151157. The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. 0000098321 00000 n methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. Cross-sectional, known-groups, and longitudinal validity were confirmed for both UEFI measures. ; Ahmad, A.; Gilani, S.A. ; Gabel, P.C. A shortened version of the FMA-EU, which includes 6 . Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for 0000071853 00000 n Upper Limb Physical Function and Adverse Effects after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective 2.5-Year Follow-up Study and Preoperative Measures. Angst, F.; Schwyzer, H.-K.; Aeschlimann, A.; Simmen, B.R. Disclaimer/Publishers Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely MeSH Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Torres-Lacomba, M.; Snchez-Snchez, B.; Prieto-Gmez, V.; Pacheco-da-Costa, S.; Yuste-Snchez, M.J.; Navarro-Brazlez, B.; Gutirrez-Ortega, C. Spanish Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Oxford Shoulder Score after Breast Cancer Surgery. Schmitz, K.H. <> By using this website, you agree to our TheEQ-5D-3L was used to clarify the participants health status and provide a criterion standard for health comparison. Two of the three other critical psychometric properties of the ULFI-Sp were both shown to be high and well supported. Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. Sartorio, F.; Moroso, M.; Vercelli, S.; Bravini, E.; Medina, M.E. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007,15(2):126134. eCollection 2023. A physiotherapist (CRJ) supervised the procedure. The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency (=0.94) and reliability (r=0.93). 0000075179 00000 n This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Oxford Shoulder Score Revisited. 8600 Rockville Pike Int J Environ Res Public Health. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae974d, Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M: Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review [In French]. 2002;5:372381. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x, Article Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one dimension: UE function. analysis was performed as described by Stratford [32]. 0000080372 00000 n The factor analysis revealed a satisfactory percentage of total variance explained by the one factor at 48.9%. The study was carried out following the ethical research principles of the Helsinki Declaration of 1964. -. An external validation scale of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS was used with bilateral correlations to establish if status had changed and an error range of 010% was allowed in determining the test-retest reliability. Patient burden from completing numerous questionnaires is an area for future consideration. ; Spalek, R.; Ferriero, G. Cross-cultural adaptation, and validity of the italian version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI-I). Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Upper Extremity Functional Scale . A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various Chi Square Approximations. An official website of the United States government. MDPI and/or 0000091146 00000 n Gabel, C.P. The KaiserMeyerOklin test determined the correlation matrix (0.889) for the ULFI-Sp in female BCS and the Bartletts Test of Sphericity (chi-squared value = 2087.167 and df 300, The ULFI-Sp showed a high degree consistency, as illustrated by the high Cronbach value ( = 0.916) with an individual item range between 0.868 and 0.875. ; Marshall, P.W.M. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. Conclusion: The Extremity Function Index proved to be a sound and easy to apply self-report disability severity measurement instrument in neuromuscular diseases. 0000084442 00000 n Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM: A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders.

Willie Stargell Home Run Veterans Stadium, Empire Lincoln Of Huntington, Articles U